Ahead of the big Xbox summer showcase in June, chief content officer Matt Booty gave fans a sense of what to expect from the event. Was it his confirmation that news of Microsoft’s next gaming console, Project Helix, would not be at the show that set off a firestorm? No, it was something much sillier.

Booty was asked on the latest Xbox podcast if fans should expect the company to continue being transparent about which games in the showcase would be multiplatform. “Yes, absolutely,” he responded. “We’ll be very clear about what platforms a game is coming to, and want to continue the precedent. I think we’ve got a good system going where we make it clear in [the] Showcase.”

What Booty was referring to is the platform logos that appear at the end of a showcase trailer to indicate what it will be available on. Console makers have traditionally only displayed their own logos during these events, forcing fans to research afterward whether a given game would be multiplatform or not. And while it used to be a safe assumption that a console maker’s first-party games would be exclusive, Xbox’s multiplatform push upended that precedent.

Hence, his explanation that fans can expect to continue seeing Switch 2 and PS5 logos at its events if a given first-party game like Fable or Halo: Campaign Evolved will also be released on those platforms. Straightforward, right? But the reaction from Xbox faithful was swift and harsh, both in the YouTube comments section and on social media.

“Xbox will continue to show competitive platform logos at upcoming Xbox Games Showcase,” Xbox poster KlobrilleI wrote on X. “Feel like the bare minimum expectation many had was for Xbox to really focus on their own platform at least for the time of the Showcase.”

The account is one of the platform’s many unpaid online cheerleaders, and it was not alone in being put off by Booty’s promised transparency. “This shows a major lack of confidence in their own Ecosystem that carries across Xbox console, cloud, PC and Handhelds,” wrote Xbox podcaster Colteastwood. “It’s their show, they should make their ecosystem Priority #1!”

Then something even more surprising happened next. Xbox CEO Asha Sharma apologized. “Seeing the feedback on logos,” she wrote on X hours later. “It was a miss, and I own it. We are talking about how we adjust for future XBOX shows.”

Some of the ecosystem’s most diehard fans took it as a win. Outsiders suggested it sets a bad precedent for the head of a major gaming platform to cater so much to its loudest voices. Try to explain the situation to a random person on the street, and they’ll probably think it’s ridiculous or, more likely, be too confused to understand what everyone is getting so up in arms about.

There’s been a real tension within Xbox ever since it started putting its exclusives on other platforms, especially Sony’s. If machine A gives you access to X games, and machine B gives you access to X + Y games, why would you ever settle for the former, everything else being equal? And everything else is increasingly equal when it comes to internal specs and overall price. It’s easy to understand why someone who invested in an Xbox Series X/S would be disappointed to see games they thought they were paying for exclusive access to end up on PS5 alongside a bunch of games they can’t play like Ghost of Yotei and Spider-Man 2.

But playing around with trailer logos does nothing to resolve that tension if the games are still going to be multiplatform anyway. Many have pointed this out. Either you are putting Fable on PS5 and want players there to buy the game, or you aren’t. If you want PS5 owners to tune into the Xbox showcase, why try to momentarily hide the fact that some of your games will be coming to their platform? Also won’t you just be giving existing fans false hope if you announce new games with only Xbox logos, just to later reveal that they are actually multiplatform?

The most popular thread on the Xbox Player Voice feedback portal is one demanding the return of exclusives. It has over 21,000 upvotes. Sharma previously promised a re-evaluation of the multiplatform push, but also said she wasn’t rushing that decision-making process. “We’ll take a data-driven approach and a strategic-driven approach, and then we’ll look at our principles and we’ll make some calls,” she told Game File‘s Stephen Totilo. “I want to make the right decision, not the fastest decision.”

So far, at least, Microsoft seems content to try to split the baby. Fable is multiplatform. Forza Horizon 6 is a timed exclusive. Gears of War: E-Day has so far only been confirmed for Xbox Series X/S and PC. That calculus might work on a revenue spreadsheet, but it doesn’t play with the crowd Sharma seems intent on winning back over. I have no idea what will be most profitable for Xbox in the long run, but sooner or later, the “return of Xbox” is going to have to mean something more than just an all-caps logo.

Exclusivity is THE “hard choice” facing the platform right now. It is probably an existential one. Sharma wrote the shift underway at Xbox “reflects a decision to be deliberate in how we show up for the players who care most about this brand.” I’m not sure logo-gate was a “miss” in that context so much as another distraction.

Share.
Exit mobile version